4 episodes taggedApproximate match across all podcasts
Home/Tags/FIX POLICY

FIX POLICY

All podcast episode summaries matching FIX POLICY β€” aggregated across every podcast we track.

4 episodes Β· Page 1/1

β€œClearly smoking something bad, because here's the irony of it, right? I opened the papers this morning, wall to wall panning, like no one thinks this is a good, like this was an effective speech. I would have been better if it's like, Elbow, here's a six pack of beer, drink that and then just go for it, right? Like, just no speech, unprepared, just let loose. And I guarantee you, I'm not saying it would have been a roaring success, but it would have been better than what was actually delivered.”

β€” Andrew Page
  • β€’

    National address lacked substance and effective policy

    β€œThe speech was so incredibly poorly constructed. And it was hackneyed. And God love Alba, I don't know what it was about Labour leaders, Shorten, Gillard and Alba over the past, you know, I think the past three leaders... they've been obviously so drilled about, don't say this, don't say that. Alba smiled like a kind of maniac because he was told to smile, obviously. And then the address was this really wooden delivery.”

    β€” Scott Phillips
  • β€’

    Everything apps concentrate dangerous levels of power

    β€œI mean, let's not go too far down this rabbit hole, but there is great convenience being on a single ecosystem, great platform. It is a little bit of a, I mean, it depends, right? It depends as always, but as sort of like, we're putting a lot of digital infrastructure in the hands of one private corporation. My point is always, well, it doesn't matter who the person is, they're a person and people are flawed.”

    β€” Andrew Page
  • β€’

    Political messaging treats the public like morons

    β€œWhat gets me is that we get, everything is dumbed down to the point where we, they only communicate to the lowest common denominator and just treats everyone like a moron. It's like, we're not that, I mean, you know, God bless us, we try as best as we can as a species, but we're not that, we're not that dumb, right? You can use more than two syllables in a word if you want, right?”

    β€” Andrew Page
  • β€’

    Authentic unscripted communication beats wooden oratory

    β€œClearly smoking something bad, because here's the irony of it, right? I opened the papers this morning, wall to wall panning, like no one thinks this is a good, like this was an effective speech. I would have been better if it's like, Elbow, here's a six pack of beer, drink that and then just go for it, right? Like, just no speech, unprepared, just let loose. And I guarantee you, I'm not saying it would have been a roaring success, but it would have been better than what was actually delivered.”

    β€” Andrew Page
  • β€’

    Focus-grouped rhetoric creates a sense of insincerity

    β€œMy favorite line, actually, of the whole thing was he talked about the shift workers and nurses. And it's just, it just, if there's anything about the, that shows how incredibly stupidly focused group this was, it's, so shift workers, what, if you work in... someone said, I would write a thing, and someone else has gone, that's good, do that, and the other has gone, fantastic, I'll read that. It's like, what were you people smoking? Like, what were you seriously doing?”

    β€” Scott Phillips
  • β€’

    National address lacked substance and effective policy

    β€œThe speech was so incredibly poorly constructed. And it was hackneyed. And God love Alba, I don't know what it was about Labour leaders, Shorten, Gillard and Alba over the past, you know, I think the past three leaders... they've been obviously so drilled about, don't say this, don't say that. Alba smiled like a kind of maniac because he was told to smile, obviously. And then the address was this really wooden delivery.”

    β€” Scott Phillips
  • β€’

    Everything apps concentrate dangerous levels of power

    β€œI mean, let's not go too far down this rabbit hole, but there is great convenience being on a single ecosystem, great platform. It is a little bit of a, I mean, it depends, right? It depends as always, but as sort of like, we're putting a lot of digital infrastructure in the hands of one private corporation. My point is always, well, it doesn't matter who the person is, they're a person and people are flawed.”

    β€” Andrew Page
  • β€’

    Political messaging treats the public like morons

    β€œWhat gets me is that we get, everything is dumbed down to the point where we, they only communicate to the lowest common denominator and just treats everyone like a moron. It's like, we're not that, I mean, you know, God bless us, we try as best as we can as a species, but we're not that, we're not that dumb, right? You can use more than two syllables in a word if you want, right?”

    β€” Andrew Page
  • β€’

    Authentic unscripted communication beats wooden oratory

    β€œClearly smoking something bad, because here's the irony of it, right? I opened the papers this morning, wall to wall panning, like no one thinks this is a good, like this was an effective speech. I would have been better if it's like, Elbow, here's a six pack of beer, drink that and then just go for it, right? Like, just no speech, unprepared, just let loose. And I guarantee you, I'm not saying it would have been a roaring success, but it would have been better than what was actually delivered.”

    β€” Andrew Page
  • β€’

    Focus-grouped rhetoric creates a sense of insincerity

    β€œMy favorite line, actually, of the whole thing was he talked about the shift workers and nurses. And it's just, it just, if there's anything about the, that shows how incredibly stupidly focused group this was, it's, so shift workers, what, if you work in... someone said, I would write a thing, and someone else has gone, that's good, do that, and the other has gone, fantastic, I'll read that. It's like, what were you people smoking? Like, what were you seriously doing?”

    β€” Scott Phillips
Good interview shows
MAR 18, 2026All-In Podcast, LLC
  • β€’

    The Democratic Party's Identity Crisis - Fetterman argues that the party has drifted from common-sense bipartisanship, alienating core voters by prioritizing ideological purity over pragmatic governance.

    β€œThe party has changed, and we’ve lost that sense of bipartisanship that used to define how we get things done in Washington.”

    β€” John Fetterman
  • β€’

    Fiscal and Border Accountability - The discussion highlights a growing urgency for stricter immigration controls and structural reforms to address the 'debt death spiral' threatening national stability.

  • β€’

    Shifting Geopolitical Alliances - Rising tensions within NATO and evolving sentiments toward Israel suggest a major recalibration of U.S. foreign policy and international influence.

    β€œThe party has changed, and we’ve lost that sense of bipartisanship that used to define how we get things done in Washington.”

    β€” John Fetterman
Macro Pods
MAR 18, 2026All-In Podcast, LLC
  • β€’

    The Democratic Party's Identity Crisis - Fetterman argues that the party has drifted from common-sense bipartisanship, alienating core voters by prioritizing ideological purity over pragmatic governance.

    β€œThe party has changed, and we’ve lost that sense of bipartisanship that used to define how we get things done in Washington.”

    β€” John Fetterman
  • β€’

    Fiscal and Border Accountability - The discussion highlights a growing urgency for stricter immigration controls and structural reforms to address the 'debt death spiral' threatening national stability.

  • β€’

    Shifting Geopolitical Alliances - Rising tensions within NATO and evolving sentiments toward Israel suggest a major recalibration of U.S. foreign policy and international influence.

    β€œThe party has changed, and we’ve lost that sense of bipartisanship that used to define how we get things done in Washington.”

    β€” John Fetterman

Stay in the Loop

Free summaries of top podcasts. More signal, less noise.