Trump's Venezuela oil rhetoric harkens back to resource nationalism
βBut in Venezuela, President Trump very explicitly said, this is about taking control of the oil. And to me, it was harkening back again to a very old frame of thinking, but it also didn't really make sense to me. In a world where the price of oil was bumping along at $65 and American producers were struggling to make ends meet with such a low oil price, to claim that we should use American military prowess to try to bring more Venezuelan oil onto the global market. I didn't see how that made sense for America commercially, except in the one narrow sense, which is not insignificant, but keeping China and Russia from really having the ability to develop Venezuela's oil.β
Energy weaponization never truly disappeared, it just receded
βWell, I would say it never went away. It just kind of receded to the background. And part of it allows me to pick up where I left off with this, the 1970s and the reaction of the world to becoming more integrated, to building up the global market in a way that oil became the most easily traded commodity in the world. So this is a very flexible global market that you can buy and sell pretty much in any part of the market, and the market will help that barrel of oil find its way to the most efficient destination. So this evolved over time, and it made the prospect of using energy as a weapon less attractive because the market could defuse the shock of cutting off a single supplier.β
Kalshi sued the U.S. government and won one month before the 2024 election
βAll we could do is we're gonna decide if we're gonna sue the government to be able to bring these markets. And that was a very hard decision. I'm I love risk. I'm a I'm a risk taker. My cofounder is really not. And we ended up winning one month before the election. And we had one month, and I remember that conversation we had with the everyone in the office. It was like, guys, it's gonna be the most intense month of our lives, and we have to just, like, literally give every single thing that we have to grow this market because our competitors were growing outside The US for over a year.β
Energy autarky is a dangerous illusion for most countries
βWe call it the Iran shock and the dangerous illusion of energy autarky, which is the idea that many countries are probably feeling, wow, exposure to this global market is dangerous, and we want to pull away from this global market. Now that could manifest itself in a number of ways. If you're China, it might mean you're going to stockpile energy. We actually saw Fatih Barul, the Executive Director of the International Energy Agency, just in the last day or so, warring countries, none by name, but warring countries generally don't stockpile. This is going to worsen the crisis.β
Clean energy transition swaps one dependency for another
βThe downside is, of course, this is going to make many more countries and economies, at least in the medium term, susceptible to political and economic pressure from China because China is the country that has a real dominance over clean energy supply chains. So again, the energy weapon is back, but it's not just the old weapon. It's not just oil and gas. It's also weaponization of clean energy supply chains.β
Hiring fancy execs early was the biggest mistake Luana would undo
βBut on the other side, I think we've done a lot of mistakes with hiring that I would have gone back and being like, don't worry about execs and hiring execs. Hire the best like, empower the very good people that you have even if they are, like, out of college, and and really focus on building a great culture with your core people. And it's easy to tell yourself you're making a lot of progress by just hiring these fancy people. Even though actually the only progress you should make is on product and and getting the, like, very, like, hardcore great core group in the company.β
A YC mentor's advice: experts are just people like you
βAnd we sat down with Michael Siebel from from YC. He's the founder of, he was the founder of Twitch, and he was CEO of YC at the time. And we were like, all these experts are telling us this is impossible. This is impossible. This is impossible. And he's he he told us, like, don't listen to the experts. They're people just like you. Whatever they're experts on, you can become an expert on as well, and they're just people. Everyone that's done anything that's impressive is just a person just like you.β
65 lawyers said prediction markets were impossible before Kalshi proved them wrong
βThere's spreadsheet of 65 names of lawyers. You take 32, you take 33, and and just call everyone. And in one day, we called the entire list, and not a single one of these lawyers said that this was doable. They were like, well, it is CFTC jurisdiction, but they were never gonna let you do it. Don't waste your time. Or it's like, no. Not even it was variations of impossible.β
Trump ignored his own cabinet's warnings before attacking Iran
βWhen Iran shut the Strait of Hormuz, Trump said, who knew they'd do that? Well, his own Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, told a Senate hearing that that was exactly the assessment of the entire intelligence community. Trump said nobody expected Iran to attack the Gulf states if it were provoked. Wrong again. Multiple former policymakers have told me this is exactly what was expected in war games. Experts sometimes get it wrong. You still need them in the room.β
Russia quietly benefits from Middle East chaos and division
βI mean, certainly Russia and the former Soviet Union, I would say, has thought about stirring up geopolitical tensions as a way of increasing the price of oil. This has been documented for people who are historians and have looked through the Politburo notes from the end of the Soviet Empire, that it was actively debated whether the Soviet Union should stir up problems in the Middle East simply to increase the price of oil. So I wouldn't go so far as to say that Russia had any particular hand in instigating this phase of this conflict. But I agree with you that for the moment, Russia is really benefiting from this.β
A One Direction engagement is the market Luana personally wants listed
βWell, this is a funny one, but I used to be a massive One Direction fan. And yesterday, in the news, I saw that, apparently, hairstyles is engaged with Zoe Kravitz. And I I would wanna market to know, you know, when the if if it's true and if there's a wedding and when it's going to be.β
Kalshi blocks politicians from trading entirely, going further than the stock market
βAnd then the last layer that we do, and we're the only ones that do this, even the stock market doesn't do it, is that for some classes of of users, you're not even able to try to trade. So we block it from the start. So for example, politicians, if you try to trade on on your markets, you're you're you're not even gonna go through, which no one does that. In the stock market, you trade, and then they try to figure out what's gonna happen.β
Federal Reserve paper found Kalshi outforecasts economists on macro trends
βAnd there was actually this very interesting paper by the Federal Reserve, talking about how cow sheet markets are better at forecasting macroeconomic trends than economists Bloomberg and even the Fed itself. Well, I believe that. All those PhDs at the Fed, they have got it wrong. They clearly have.β
Today's oil supply disruption exceeds the 1973 shock
βThe obvious energy shock that we compare it to are the shocks of the 1970s. 1973, the oil embargo where Arab members of OPEC declined to export their oil to the United States and other supporters of Israel in the 1973 war. But they also started to take oil off the market, the absolute amount of oil that was on the market. So, percentage wise and the physical number of barrels that were taken off the market in 1973 is considerably less than is happening today. As you and your listeners will have heard over and over again, this is the biggest supply disruption that we've ever seen.β
βAnd the reasons for this goes back to the time that I spent in Iraq. I spent about two years in Iraq immediately after Saddam fled, and then throughout the years that followed off and on. And America's 2003 war in Iraq was about primarily weapons of mass destruction. It was not about getting control over Iraqi oil. But to this day, most Iraqis, when they try to make sense of the American intervention, they come back to oil, that it must have been about Iraqi oil. So, in a world where President Trump said over the weekend, he wishes he could just take the oil. That's what he'd like to do if the American people would allow him to. I think this is going to be rhetoric that we're going to hear throughout Iranian politics for a long time to come and not to America's benefit.β
Luana lost and recovered her first Bitcoin from an MIT giveaway
βSo I was a freshman in college, and I got an email saying the MIT Bitcoin Club, I think was the name, or Bitcoin Lab, had a $100 of Bitcoin of anyone that would just, like, sign up to Coinbase. That I think was, like, point three of a Bitcoin at the time. And I was, like, a freshman in college. I had no money. I was like, oh, yes. I'm gonna get this a $100 and see who he goes. And then I lost my password. So very good because I didn't sell. And now I I hold this till till today.β
Ballet training instilled comfort with failure and repetition
βAnd I think that ballet is very good at this because it teaches you that failing is completely normal. Like, you're only gonna get to do, like, the three, you know, pirouettes or whatever, the three turns if you try to do one and you fail a 100,000 times, and then you get to one, and then you get to two. And and being okay with the concept of, like with ballet, you're, like, you're trying, and the downside is actually pretty bad because if you fall, you hurt yourself, you might break your foot or something. But you still have to try and do it and and understand it takes time and takes practice.β