2 episodes taggedApproximate match across all podcasts
Home/Tags/WATCH GLOBAL OIL

WATCH GLOBAL OIL

All podcast episode summaries matching WATCH GLOBAL OIL β€” aggregated across every podcast we track.

2 episodes Β· Page 1/1

β€œI think prices are permanently higher. I mean, when I say permanent, nothing's permanent, but at least in the foreseeable future, this year, next year, the year after. You know, we're not there's no going back to the $60, $65 bucks a barrel we were paying before all this mess. You're still left with a fee that's not inconsequential, and then, of course, insurance companies are gonna demand a higher insurance premium for insuring the traffic that moves through this strait because, you know, who knows what will happen in the future.”

β€” Mark Zandi
Macro Pods
APR 10, 2026Vox Media Podcast Network
  • β€’

    Oil prices have established a permanently higher floor

    β€œI think prices are permanently higher. I mean, when I say permanent, nothing's permanent, but at least in the foreseeable future, this year, next year, the year after. You know, we're not there's no going back to the $60, $65 bucks a barrel we were paying before all this mess. You're still left with a fee that's not inconsequential, and then, of course, insurance companies are gonna demand a higher insurance premium for insuring the traffic that moves through this strait because, you know, who knows what will happen in the future.”

    β€” Mark Zandi
  • β€’

    Markets now factor in presidential geopolitical posturing

    β€œFeels pretty close to script, more or less. You know, the president has gone down this path in other ways. And when push comes to shove, when markets start to react, when stock prices are down, when interest rates are up, and in this case, when oil prices are up, he figures out a way to pivot, to stand down, and to declare victory and hopefully move on.”

    β€” Mark Zandi
  • β€’

    New Iranian ship fees will drive inflation higher

    β€œIran is charging $2,000,000 for every ship that passes through the Strait Of Hormuz. And they have said in the agreement that they have full sovereignty over the Strait, and now they're gonna charge people for moving goods through it. So I guess the question is, one, do you think that that holds? And two, how significant is it from an inflation perspective? Because it seems like that is, yes, ships can pass through, but now there's a toll.”

    β€” Ed Elson
  • β€’

    Deglobalization acts as a corrosive force on growth

    β€œI view this as a part of a broader, a very corrosive trend, and that that's the deglobalization of the economy that The US is pulling away from the rest of the world very quickly. I mean, you know, tariffs, immigration policy, what we're doing geopolitically. And then, of course, now the rest of the world is pulling away from us very quickly. If we are deglobalizing and this is just one more thing that will cause that process to continue and potentially even accelerate, it has all kinds of corrosive effects.”

    β€” Mark Zandi
  • β€’

    US global economic leadership faces structural pressure

    β€œThe US is a big economyβ€”it's the largest on the planetβ€”so, you know, it's still gonna play a very central role, but increasingly less of one as we move forward. We have benefited enormously from the globalization process and the fact that The US is central and the US dollar is central to everything that goes on in the world. And that is now gonna be under pressure; it was under pressure before all this, and it will be under even more pressure going forward.”

    β€” Mark Zandi
Macro Pods
MAR 27, 2026Blockworks
  • β€’

    Middle East tensions are the primary driver of macro volatility - supply chain disruptions and geopolitical risks in the energy sector are creating a floor for inflation that the Fed cannot easily control.

    β€œEnergy is really the driver here; if you have a supply shock in oil, that's something the Fed can't really control but has to react to.”

    β€” Joseph Wang
  • β€’

    The Federal Reserve is caught in a policy trap - central bankers face a lose-lose scenario where they cannot cut rates into a supply-side energy shock without risking an inflation spiral, yet keeping rates high threatens financial stability.

    β€œThey are in a position where they might have to look through some of this inflation, but that risks losing credibility with the markets.”

    β€” Joseph Wang
  • β€’

    Structural liquidity constraints are capping risk assets - the combination of Quantitative Tightening and a regime shift in banking means there is no longer a 'wall of money' available to drive markets significantly higher.

    β€œWe are seeing a regime shift in how liquidity is provisioned, and that usually means a lot more volatility for risk assets.”

    β€” Joseph Wang

Stay in the Loop

Free summaries of top podcasts. More signal, less noise.