Operations now prioritize rigid deadlines over creative innovation
βWhat Tim did over time was turn Apple into a juggernaut, a giant machine where operations had a bigger voice in product development. Some of that was necessity. They're making 200 million iPhones a year. You have to make sure that you hit certain deadlines to be able to deliver those iPhones. But the rigidness of those deadlines closed some of the creativity possibilities for people who had once developed these products in a more nimble fashion, and that's locked them into the product lineup they have, and to Patrick's point, made it hard to be as innovative as they once were.β
βI did the Vision Pro demo and was in awe of this thing. Somehow convinced my spouse to let me get $3,500 to spend on the device, and after six days, took it back. Within six days, I realized this thing is useless. You can't have it on your head for more than 45 minutes. It's an engineering marvel, but it's basically a disaster as a product. No pun intended, it lacks vision. That's Tim Cook, the engineering talent in the company can build a great product, but it doesn't have an ecosystem. I don't think Tim Cook is much of a partnerships guy.β
Shift to Regional Burden-Sharing - The Trump administration is moving away from direct military intervention toward a model where regional allies are expected to take the lead in maintaining power balances.
βThe United States is transitioning from being the global policeman to an offshore balancer of power.β
Prioritizing Great Power Competition - By resolving or de-escalating legacy conflicts in the Middle East, the U.S. seeks to redirect its strategic focus and resources toward the long-term challenge of China.
βThe United States is transitioning from being the global policeman to an offshore balancer of power.β
China and Services became Apple's financial bedrock
βThe first was striking a China mobile deal two years after taking over as CEO of the company. It changed Apple's trajectory in China. It unlocked the iPhone in China and turned China not just from a market that made and produced the iPhone, but it turned Apple into a company that really captured sales from the rising middle class in China. That's really become a bedrock of their business. Then the second thing he did was he looked at the iPhone and he said, okay, well, how do we make more money off a product that now is in the pockets of a billion people around the world? He leaned into services in 2019 and made that a focus.β
China trade relations face significant blockade disruption
β90 percent of the oil that Iran ships out is headed to China. Much of it is on Chinese crewed, Chinese flagged ships. The president's supposed to go to Beijing in about four weeks, and what he was hoping was going to be this meeting all about a new detente between China and the United States.β
βThe US Navy needed to do was reverse the dynamic, make sure that it wasn't the Iranians who were controlling traffic through the Strait, but that it was the US Navy that was. And that sounds like a fairly straightforward process given the size of the US Navy. But in fact, it turns out, it's looking like it will be pretty complicated to execute.β
Apple remains drastically behind competitors in AI spending
βIs this part of the AI problem here? We talked about the fact that Apple is basically the only company that is not investing hundreds of billions of dollars into AI infrastructure. I mean, look at Amazon, its CapEx is expected to reach $200 billion this year. For Google, it's close to that, $175 billion. Then Apple is going to spend only $14 billion. They're actually cutting their spending. What does that say about the company? Is that because they don't have vision, or is it because they have discipline?β
βAs you said, $3.6 trillion added to Apple's market cap. He clearly fulfilled whatever tasks Steve Jobs set him out to do. His role was not necessarily to come up with breakthrough products. It was to iterate what Steve Jobs had already come up with on a global scale. He squeezed every penny that was really available in the supply chain. He built up services, he put Apple into new areas like Apple TV and a host of things like that. He's getting $20 billion of profit per year just out of the Google relationship, just using the user base in Apple's favor.β
βIt's not only the overall Iranian economy that's dependent on this revenue, it's particularly the government and within that, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps which gets almost all of its revenue and thus its ability to pursue the war from oil exports.β
βOne major risk, of course, is that the IRGC and Iran itself lashes out. They have threatened to attack these US Navy ships, and so you could have a major escalation of the fighting again based over the ships coming into the strait or even standing back outside.β
Infrastructure damage threatens long-term energy production
βI'd say a third big category of risk is that Iran responds by restarting attacks on energy infrastructure throughout the Persian Gulf. That is one that carries really long-term risks for the global energy system and the global economy, because as you do more damage to the region's infrastructure, prevent refineries from operating, you risk taking energy offline for a long period of time.β